FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
For those who may be new to the series, Camp Buddy follows the adventures of a group of young scouts as they navigate the challenges and joys of summer camp. Scoutmaster V16 Mikkoukun, the latest iteration, introduces a new cast of characters while maintaining the core spirit of friendship and adventure that defines the series.
Another significant aspect of Scoutmaster V16 Mikkoukun is its focus on themes that are relevant to young people, such as self-discovery, friendship, and emotional intelligence. As the anime and manga industries continue to evolve, it's clear that creators are prioritizing stories that speak to the experiences and concerns of contemporary youth.
The Evolution of Camaraderie: A Deep Dive into Camp Buddy Scoutmaster V16 Mikkoukun
As we look to the future of anime and manga, it's clear that series like Camp Buddy Scoutmaster V16 Mikkoukun will continue to play an important role in shaping the medium and resonating with audiences. Whether you're a longtime fan of the series or just discovering it now, there's no denying the power of this charming and uplifting show to bring people together and inspire meaningful connections.
So, what does Camp Buddy Scoutmaster V16 Mikkoukun reveal about the state of modern anime and manga? One key takeaway is the growing emphasis on character-driven storytelling and nuanced character development. In an era where audiences are increasingly hungry for complex, realistic portrayals of human relationships, series like Camp Buddy are well-positioned to resonate with fans.
The world of anime and manga has given us numerous iconic characters and series over the years, but few have captured the essence of camaraderie and friendship as beautifully as Camp Buddy Scoutmaster V16 Mikkoukun. This latest installment in the Camp Buddy series has taken the internet by storm, with fans and critics alike praising its thoughtful storytelling, lovable characters, and nuanced exploration of themes that resonate with audiences of all ages.
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.