Second: jargon and shorthand are social tools with costs. They speed up in-group communication but exclude outsiders and hinder onboarding. A compact tag is efficient for the individual who created it, but costly for teams, open-source communities, cross-disciplinary projects, and archival records. Good practice balances brevity with discoverability: adopt predictable conventions (date or semantic versioning, author initials, descriptive keywords) and pair terse names with a single authoritative place for metadata — a README, changelog, or file header.

First: names matter. Whether in code, research, or project files, labels serve as handles that let collaborators find, trust, and reuse work. “v258” suggests a version; “pt” could mean point, part, or Portuguese; “geza” reads like a name or acronym; “top” hints at priority or a UI element. Taken together they may be meaningful to one person and opaque to everyone else. When we choose opaque labels, we trade short-term convenience for long-term friction. Future you — or your colleague — pays by hunting through folders, guessing intent, or recreating work that already exists.

Clarity is not verbosity; it is strategic generosity. Rename. Document. Share the why. The future collaborators — and future you — will thank you.